How it swung
Modeled from the scoreline, clock and pre-match Aura. Each goal resets the odds.
Key moments
6′
▮Daniel Elfadlibooked
45′⚽0–1
RK
Ransford-Yeboah Konigsdorfferassist P. OteleHamburger SV’s chances ▲ 27%⚡ biggest swing of the match
S. Contehfor Omar Traore⇅
46′
S. Schimmerfor Marvin Pieringer⇅
46′
46′
⇅J. Torunarighafor Daniel Elfadli
46′
⇅D. Downsfor Albert-Mboyo Sambi Lokonga
M. Honsakfor Arijon Ibrahimovic⇅
63′
B. Zivzivadzefor Julian Niehues⇅
64′
68′
⇅W. Mikelbrencisfor Ransford-Yeboah Konigsdorffer
68′
⇅R. Philippefor Philip Otele
A. Beckfor Benedikt Gimber⇅
77′
78′⚽0–2
RP
80′
⇅G. Gocholeishvilifor Fabio Vieira
Goal cancelledStefan SchimmerVAR
84′
88′
▮William Mikelbrencisbooked
Match stats
1. FC HeidenheimHamburger SV
Possession
48%
52%
Shots (on target)
20 (4)
14 (5)
Expected goals (xG)
1.53
1.48
Pass accuracy
76%
80%
1. FC Heidenheim3-4-2-1vs3-4-2-1Hamburger SV
1. FC Heidenheim XI €42M€122M Hamburger SV XI
Hamburger SV’s starting XI cost €80M more to assemble. Each chip is a player’s market value.
DF8.3🇵🇹Fernandes
LV7.2🇭🇷Vuskovic
WO6.9🇫🇷Omari
MM6.1🇨🇭Muheim
NR6.4🇩🇪Remberg
BJ6.7Jatta
DR6.7🇩🇪Ramaj
PM6.8🇩🇪Mainka
MB7.2🇩🇪Busch
HB
7.2🇩🇪Behrens
7.2🇩🇪BehrensND7.3🇩🇪Dorsch
ED7.1🇩🇪Dinkci
PitchMog
8.5+ great7.0+ solid6.0+ avgunder 6★ POTM⇅ subbed off
dark chip = market valueflag = nationality⇅ subbed off
1. FC Heidenheim bench
SierslebenFohrenbachFellerHonsak ▲ 63′ · 6.4Beck ▲ 77′ · 6.1SchoppnerZivzivadze ▲ 64′ · 6.1Schimmer ▲ 46′ · 6.3Conteh ▲ 46′ · 6.3
Hamburger SV bench
TangvikMikelbrencis ▲ 68′ · 6.5Gocholeishvili ▲ 80′ · 7.2Torunarigha ▲ 46′ · 7.2MegeedGlatzelPhilippe ▲ 68′ · 7.2Downs ▲ 46′ · 6.3Stange
Match stats
Ball share over the 90 · 1. FC Heidenheim 48% · Hamburger SV 52%
1. FC HeidenheimHamburger SV
Shots (on target)
20 (4)
14 (5)
Shots (in box)
13 (7)
10 (4)
Expected goals (xG)
1.53
1.48
Big chances
1
1
Pass accuracy
76%
80%
Corners
10
8
Fouls
6
11
Saves
3
4
xG race
1. FC Heidenheim1.57Hamburger SV1.52
Totals here sum this match’s shots, so they can sit a fraction off the provider’s xG figure above.
Shot map
1. FC Heidenheim1.6 xG · 20 shots · 0 goals
- 5′NiehuesRight foot · AssistedOff targetxG 0.05
- 5′DorschRight foot · AssistedOn targetxG 0.18
- 23′PieringerRight foot · Open playOff targetxG 0.10
- 46′Right foot · From a cornerOff targetxG 0.04
- 46′NiehuesRight foot · From a cornerOff targetxG 0.02
- 52′DinkciLeft foot · AssistedOff targetxG 0.06
- 62′DinkciRight foot · AssistedOff targetxG 0.03
- 66′Header · From a cornerOff targetxG 0.08
- 67′ZivzivadzeRight foot · From a cornerOff targetxG 0.07
- 67′DinkciRight foot · From a cornerOff targetxG 0.09
- 67′HonsakHeader · From a cornerOff targetxG 0.01
- 67′MainkaHeader · From a cornerOn targetxG 0.01
- 68′DinkciRight foot · From a throw-inOff targetxG 0.07
- 73′MainkaHeader · From a cornerOff targetxG 0.21
- 73′MainkaHeader · From a throw-inOff targetxG 0.02
- 76′DinkciHeader · From a cornerOn targetxG 0.03
- 76′Header · From a cornerOn targetxG 0.13
- 77′MainkaHeader · From a cornerOff targetxG 0.13
- 78′ZivzivadzeLeft foot · AssistedOff targetxG 0.18
- 90′BeckRight foot · AssistedOff targetxG 0.06
🧤 Fernandes stopped 4 of 4 on target
Hamburger SV1.5 xG · 14 shots · 2 goals
- 25′Left foot · AssistedOn targetxG 0.02
- 33′Right foot · AssistedOff targetxG 0.03
- 34′JattaRight foot · From a cornerOff targetxG 0.02
- 36′Left foot · Open playOff targetxG 0.09
- 40′Left foot · AssistedOff targetxG 0.04
- 45′1Left foot · Fast breakGoalxG 0.06
- 48′Right foot · From a cornerOff targetxG 0.02
- 56′Left foot · Open playOff targetxG 0.06
- 61′Header · From a cornerOff targetxG 0.10
- 78′2Left foot · Fast breakGoalxG 0.81
- 81′Right foot · From a throw-inOn targetxG 0.06
- 85′RembergRight foot · Open playOff targetxG 0.02
- 85′Right foot · AssistedOff targetxG 0.14
- 86′Left foot · From a throw-inOn targetxG 0.05
🧤 Ramaj stopped 3 of 5 on target
1numbered = goal, matches the liston targetoff targetdot size = chance quality (xG)
Player ratings
How we rate
PitchMog Match Rating is our 0–10 score for how a player performed in this match. Any value we cannot back with real match data is left blank.
How we rate →
